Mina Wahab
SANTA BARBARA, Calif. (KEYT) —A landmark settlement between Meta and dozens of states could change how millions of teenagers use Facebook and Instagram.
Meta has agreed to pay up to $17 billion to settle claims that the company designed its social media platforms to keep children and teenagers engaged and failed to adequately protect young users.
The company denies wrongdoing.
Here in Santa Barbara, local parents and mental health professionals say they welcome new safeguards for young people.
Local psychologist: Social media can be a positive tool — in moderation
Pauline Yeghnazar Peck is a Santa Barbara mom, psychologist and Instagram influencer. She uses her platform to help people work through trauma, but says social media is intentionally designed to keep users coming back.
“It’s made to be very enticing to keep us coming back.”
Peck says social media isn’t inherently harmful and can be a valuable way for people to connect and find information.
But she believes young people, in particular, need healthy boundaries around their use.
“Social media is here and it can be a tool, it can be a really positive tool. So I think that the more we embrace it but also have some healthy skepticism, we’re actually going to be able to use it as a tool for improvement rather than a deterioration of connection and community.”
What Meta is agreeing to change
Under the proposed settlement, Meta would implement several new protections for users under 18.
Those include:
A default two-hour daily limit on Facebook and Instagram for teens
Overnight restrictions on teen accounts
Limits on notifications during school hours
Stronger parental controls
Stronger age-verification measures
The ability for teens to turn off personalized feeds
Hiding like and reaction counts for minors
Restrictions on certain cosmetic filters for young users
Peck says some of those changes could help address the pressure young people experience online.
“These are important measures, and I think this is kind of a groundbreaking case to say we can hold corporations accountable no matter how big they are.”
She particularly supports restrictions on cosmetic filters, which can alter a person’s appearance.
“I like the restriction around the cosmetic filters and not having people’s faces being distorted in that way, because I think the more realistic images and representations people see, especially teens whose self-identity is developing and who are insecure just by nature of where they are in development, I think that’s going to be really healthy.”
Santa Barbara parents welcome more accountability
Andi Schloss, a local influencer and mother, says parents have struggled to keep up with how quickly children are gaining access to smartphones and social media.
“Parents can’t seem to get this one right. They’re giving their kids cell phones at a very early age. They’re allowing them permissions on social media in different platforms at which is just so dangerous.”
Schloss says she believes government intervention is necessary when it comes to protecting children online.
“In this case, I do think the government needed to step in and make some changes just for our kids’ futures.”
Where will California’s money go?
The settlement could also bring billions of dollars to California.
The state is expected to receive more than $2 billion over the next decade under the agreement.
The money would go to the state, rather than directly to families.
Schloss says she hopes some of that money will be used to help schools address student cellphone use.
“I’m hoping that this amount of money goes into the schools to get a better grasp on phones, in schools where the kids aren’t being monitored, and to put those in a cell phone box and just eliminate them for the entire day so the kids can at least go six hours a day without phones.”
The issue is particularly relevant in Santa Barbara, where Santa Barbara Unified has already been working to reduce student reliance on personal devices through its “Tech with Intent” initiative.
A broader debate over social media and kids
The settlement comes as parents, schools and mental health professionals across the country continue debating the impact of social media on young people.
Supporters of the agreement say requiring safeguards to be built into the platforms themselves could take some of the burden off parents.
But experts also caution that limiting screen time alone may not address every issue associated with social media.
For Peck, the goal isn’t necessarily to eliminate social media from young people’s lives — but to teach them how to use it responsibly.
The proposed settlement still requires court approval.
Meta says it has already taken steps to protect teens online and continues to deny the allegations at the center of the case.
The Latest Breaking News, Weather Alerts, Sports and More Anytime On Our Mobile Apps. Keep Up With the Latest Articles by Signing Up for the News Channel 3-12 Newsletter.
Click here to follow the original article.