Month: July 2026

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (KMIZ)

Rudy Veit has been a member of the Missouri House of Representatives from the 59th District since 2019. And he is now looking to bring his experience to the State Senate.

Veit is one of the six candidates seeking the Senate District 6 seat after Sen. Mike Bernskoetter’s term is up in January 2027. The state Senate district covers several Mid-Missouri counties, including Cole, Camden, Miller, Moniteau and Morgan.

Veit’s opponents are Amber Buckles, Derrick Spicer, Todd “Ike” Skelton, Lisa Thomas and Jake Vogel.

HALEY SWAINO: What would you like voters to know about you as a person and as a candidate?

RUDY VEIT: One, I’m a conservative, and I believe in protecting our constitutional rights. I’m a father of four children and eight grandchildren. I’m an attorney and have a degree in agricultural economics; I have a broad background. I’ve been in business. But more important, I bring to the organization eight years experience in the House of Representatives, with a law degree and previous experience. I know how to look at bills, look at the collateral consequences, not just vote on bills because they have a nice tone to them or leadership thinks you should.

SWAINO: What do you see as some of the top issues facing Senate District 6, and maybe what specific legislation would you introduce or support to address those issues?

VEIT: Well, what’s affecting District 6 is affecting everybody, and that’s the economy. We’re going to have to, and the budget, because our budget is going to be cut and we’re going to have to figure out ways to manage our expenditures and manage our income, and also to ensure that we still have an economic base to work with. The economy is on everybody’s mind right now, and the passing of Amendment 5 will only increase the cost to the average of my constituents and small businesses as another overhead that we do not need right now.

SWAINO: And how will you balance economic growth within Missouri, while also preserving the quality of life of people living in Missouri communities?

VEIT: Well, one of the things is in any future legislation, if you’re going to have new costs, you ought to define where the revenue’s coming from or what program you’re willing to cut. Everybody wants lower taxes and, but everybody also wants all the benefits. And so we have to balance that out on an ongoing basis. Understand, we cannot provide services for everybody … The thing I hate worse than taxes is passing the debt on down to my kids.

SWAINO: How will you work with legislators from both parties when your constituents’ interests are at stake?

VEIT: Well, I’ve worked with both parties for a long time. You look back on 557, which was the protection of the residential care facility for children. I worked across both party lines to get that passed. Modern-day issues up there are not, should not, be based upon party lines. We need to look at what the bill does, who that affects, and how we can work together, get together, and reach a compromise, or a consensus of what’s best for everyone.

SWAINO: Perfect. And then, because of your time in office, could you maybe give an example of a time you’ve maybe built consensus there on the Capitol?

VEIT: One of the major bills I passed is 557, which was the bill which dealt with residential care facilities where kids are being raped, abused and hard-treated under the guise of just being a religious organization. I brought the religious organizations along with the Republican and Democratic leadership to pass a bill that regulates them, until they provide their primary goal to providing for certain kids or aged care as needed, but put in safeguards so that there’s not such abuse going on and uncontrolled abuse. And that was important enough that HBO did a documentary on it. And I get calls every day from people that, how I changed their lives … and trying to protect it. And a lot of my bills you do have to get across party lines. A lot of them were not political issues. Most of my bills are bills that just keep the state running, and that need consensus from everyone. And we need to keep politics out of it.

SWAINO: How will you stay accountable to the people of District 6, if elected? And how will constituents expect to communicate with you throughout your term?

VEIT: Well, as a lawyer and representing many individuals, I had a cell phone, and I kept my cell phone on 24 hours a day. I had to do that as well as continue. As for my clients, I didn’t do that for my constituents. I’m always available when they call. I return calls, and they want me to show up, to show up all my whole career as an attorney and practicing attorney, I’ve been involved in many, many organizations, from sports to health, to pregnancy health center, heart association, to NRA, and all those different organizations has been my lifestyle. And it doesn’t change anything. I treat my constituents just as I did my clients. I’m now their employee.

SWAINO: Alright. This is a question I’m asking to everybody, and it’s a bit of a broad one. What should Missouri do to address the rising cost of living? Obviously, there’s stuff happening at the federal level, but working with the budget.

VEIT: Well, we need to eliminate what regulations we can. So the cost of unnecessary regulations don’t drive prices up. We need to encourage more small businesses. We need to also provide a good basic education for everybody that they can afford, so that we have a workforce in other industries who want to come here. Workforce shortage is everywhere, and if we show that we have a high-quality workforce and willing to work then business will come.

SWAINO: Then what is your position on state taxes? Would you support raising or lowering them?

VEIT: Amendment 5 isn’t a tax reduction; it’s just a tax reallocation. So that does nothing. I believe that when we look at taxes, if you want to cut a tax, tell me what program you’re going to cut. So we’re not, we keep a balanced budget. If you want to freeze a program, tell me where you’re getting the revenue or what program you’re going to cut to get a revenue. Openness in all the affairs, openness in all of our action, to show what they truly are doing on the budget. And that is the only way you’re going to balance the budget is not just cut a tax here, cut a tax here, and then have unlimited new programs. They have to offset each other.

SWAINO: Why are you the best candidate for this seat?

VEIT: I have a very broad background. I’ve been involved in community activities my whole life. I’ve been, and I can read the bills and understand the bills.I have eight years of experience. I just didn’t say, ‘Okay, I won’t be a senator.’ No, I took the route of going with the House of Representatives so I could learn the ropes in that … And I am also one of the few people that will stand up to establish money when I think something is fundamentally wrong. And that’s why I voted no on Amendment 5. I was one of three Republicans who voted. And I had to protect the constitutional rights of individuals to have, to prevent us from having unlimited taxes on services, sales tax and anything. And also the spending of the Hancock Amendment, all on the promise of, ‘Trust me,’ and not any clear definition of what we’re going to do.

I had the ability to read the bill and study the bill. Even if we pass it, I don’t think we’re going to get the job done because this, ‘thou shalt reduce federal state income tax.’ It doesn’t say what happens if we don’t. Get to those other procedural rules that are not being worked out: the first bill, when it came to the Senate, came out of the House. It had that ‘thou shall pass.’ It was in there, but also said, if we don’t, this is what’s going to happen. None of that is in the amendment anymore. And so it is an open-ended amendment. It says trust me, and we’re going to be not a tax reduction but a tax increase for most, and most of my constituents, and a real problem for our small businesses. And they’re now going to have to keep another set of books if they’re going to collect for all the services and that. It’s more regulations, more costs. We haven’t been addressed how, what it’s gonna cost the state to implement a whole new taxing system.

SWAINO: This is a question I’ve kind of been asking everybody. I’ve been talking to you, you’re obviously coming near the end of your campaign now and have been able to get your message out. What’s one thing you wish people would ask you about that you want voters to know about you before they head to the polls? This may be a question you don’t get asked often that you want to share.

VEIT: Well, my background and activities I’ve done in the community. I have been a supporter of sports, every activity. My whole life has been volunteering. My whole life has been supporting parish picnics, 4-H, FFA, Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, pregnancy help center, … sports, I’ve sponsored numerous ball teams and numerous organizations, and just wherever I can to help. I believe we all have time, talent and treasure to give. May not be the same, but we can all get the same thing. We’ve got to give something. And I have had it with my running for Senate. I’ve had the time, I’ve got the talent, and public education and good education. It’s time for me to give back.

SWAINO: And then last question here. If you want to look at the camera for this one, I can turn this down. Some voters who, you know, may still not be sure how they want to cast their vote. What would you tell them about you as they head to the ballot box?

VEIT: I am one who will stand up for my constituents. Voting no on Amendment 5 came at a cost and under a lot of pressure. I stood up to that cost. The same thing on Amendment 4. I stood up to that, and knowing that there would be consequences. But I was willing to vote my conscience, and I was willing to pay the price. And I don’t need someone telling me on Capitol Hill that it’s a bad bill when I can read the bill as well as anyone. I’ve litigated bills, I’ve been in trial on bills. And I can treat, and I believe in treating my constituents just as I did my clients. They come first and have to. Therefore, I’m their employee, and I have to support them.

After filming and before ABC 17’s Haley Swaino left the interview, Veit asked to add one more statement.

“I also want to tell my constituents, our people, that I am conservative and that that is validated by the endorsement of our U.S. Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer, Rep. Willard Haley, Rep. Dave Griffith, Rep. Mike Bernskoetter, the Sheriffs Association, NRA rated A, and every school organization has supported me and endorsed me. Every public school and every public school organization has endorsed me and supports me. And I also have the endorsement of our late [former] Sen. Larry Rohrbach, who has always been known for being conservative,” Veit said.

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (KMIZ)

Psychiatrist and former member of the Missouri House of Representatives, Lisa Thomas, wants to return to the Capitol Building in January.

She believes her experience serving from 2021 to 2025 and her background in health will help get important issues addressed in the Senate for Mid-Missourians.

Thomas is one of the six candidates seeking the Senate District 6 seat after Sen. Mike Bernskoetter’s term is up in January 2027. The state senate district covers several Mid-Missouri counties, including Cole, Camden, Miller, Moniteau and Morgan.

Thomas’ opponents are Amber Buckles, Derrick Spicer, Todd “Ike” Skelton, Rudy Veit and Jake Vogel.

HALEY SWAINO: What would you like voters to know about you as a person and also as a candidate?

LISA THOMAS: Well, sure. I’m a lifelong Missourian. I’m a Christian constitutional conservative. Republican Trump supporter from the escalator on down. And I am a psychiatrist by training. So, a medical doctor. I’m the only medical doctor running for the Sixth District. And I think that’s pretty important since we’ve got that nonpartisan issue that touches everybody, which is healthcare and mental healthcare. We need affordable, accessible and top-quality healthcare. I’m primed and ready to lead that effort to make sure we have that available for all Missourians.

SWAINO: What do you see as the top issues facing Senate District 6, and also what specific legislation would you maybe introduce or support to address those issues?

THOMAS: Well, definitely the issue of affordability, just in general, and our taxing structure, our spending problem. I guess first and foremost, the legislature absolutely has a spending problem. Because we need to get that under control with our priorities and also clawing back waste, fraud and abuse, which will swell our coffers. Then we can look at taxing structures and making the cuts that we need to make because we just can’t fund every program. But we do not want to leave vulnerable individuals without services. So we have to be smart about how we spend the dollars that we have. Just like all families have to watch their pocketbook, and they make choices. So the legislature and the government needs to do the same thing. We can’t do everything. We need to make the right choices.

SWAINO: That leads well into my next question. How will you balance economic growth in the Show-Me State while also preserving the quality of life for people living in communities?

THOMAS: Well, we need to make Missouri what it already is — the Show-Me State. And it should be attractive to all. We are the best state in our union by far, so that being said, we have to have policies that encourage business to come here and the businesses that are here to stay here. We want to incentivize families to not only stay here, but when their children graduate from school or other relatives are looking at places to go, that they come and stay here because we want to be strong, but we need to maintain the folks that we have and be proud of Missouri.

Our policies, too, as I said, help not drain resources either from businesses or from families. So we don’t want to overtax. I stood against the pressures that were trying to get us to vote for the gas tax. And I said, no, that’s going to harm families. I will be voting no on Amendment 5 because, again, that’s shifting our burden to, to the lower income, and also to working families and those on fixed incomes. Like I said, get our budget and our spending under control before we do policy testing, policy changes. And we also want to know what are the details. As a Republican, I definitely prefer reduction or elimination of any and all taxes. But we’re the Show-Me State, show me the plan. And in Amendment 5, that plan is missing in action.

SWAINO: How would you work with legislators from both parties when your constituent interests are at stake?

THOMAS: Well, again, as the only physician in this race, healthcare is a bipartisan issue. It affects everybody. Another issue that I’m passionate about is boating and water safety. A life jacket doesn’t care what party you belong to, but it’s going to save your life, doesn’t care what your gender is. It doesn’t care who you voted for or what church you belong to. But again, it’s something that we should get behind. And there’s a variety of boating and water safety topics. But again, they touch everybody. So, for one thing, as I said, I want to work across the aisle because these things affect everybody, and we don’t need to constantly divide. Diversity is not a bad word. We can come together. There’s more that unites us than divides us. And I would like to be that person. As a physician, I treat everybody. As a legislator, everybody that’s in my district is my constituent. The entire state is my constituent. And I would like to be in the Senate to represent that and to move us forward.

SWAINO: How will you stay accountable to the people of District 6, if elected? And how can constituents expect to communicate with you throughout the term?

THOMAS: Obviously, through my office, having been in the state House before, you know, you have to have a staff, you have phones, you have email, text. I give out my number. I don’t mind being interrupted seven days a week whenever I’m out and about with people. Matter of fact, the most important part of the job is constituent services. Because we’re hired by the people to represent them. Legislating is much less important. And so staying in touch, we have all sorts of new technology. But you know, the old tried and true conversation. There you go. And like I said, happy to talk to anybody, anywhere, any time. That’s what it’s all about.

SWAINO: I asked this question to everybody, and it’s a bit broad, and also, of course, things at the federal level have to work out. But what should Missouri do to help address the rising cost of living?

THOMAS: Well, again, I was against the gas tax. We have some options of rolling that back, whether that’s temporary or permanent. Voting against Amendment 5, because I am concerned that that will be a tax shift from the wealthy to those of lesser means. Again, with no guardrails, getting rid of the Hancock Amendment. So the protections that should be there. That’s scary. Go back to the drawing board, work on that plan again. Get our spending under control. Like you said, reduce, eliminate and claw back the waste fraud and abuse. We don’t want to be Minnesota or California. But you know what? This state has waste, fraud and abuse. To bring that back under control, it’s going to swell our coffers. There’s a number of other things we can do, but that would be the first to start with.

SWAINO: Why are you the best candidate for this seat?

THOMAS: Well, again, I’m the only physician, so I understand healthcare, health, mental health and social services. That constitutes an enormous part of our annual state budget. I’ve had boots on the ground experience, so I don’t just say we need to lower healthcare costs. That’s a big duh. What I can do is tell you we can do this, this and this today, and we can absolutely impact our costs. We need to negotiate a reasonable tort reform that’s going to lower individual and government healthcare costs tomorrow. We have a group of providers, the only ones by statute; we can tell them where to practice, and guess where that is? Rural and underserved communities. Bingo. That’s what we need to do. We need to be the welcoming state for that group of practitioners. Bring them in. Get them to work. We need to make sure that we have pricing transparency on drugs so that we can have the lowest cost. We need PBMs [pharmacy benefit managers] to be clear about what they’re doing. We need to protect the doctor-patient relationship. Government shouldn’t be interfering. You and your doctor should make decisions about your own healthcare and not be told you have to do this or that. That’s going to help. I can go on and on for the rest of the day if you’d like.

SWAINO: My next question here, you know, nearing the end of the campaign here in just a couple of weeks. What may be something in candidate forums or just throughout the campaigning that you haven’t been asked that you want people to know about you? It could be an issue you’re passionate about, something about yourself.

THOMAS: That’s a question, you’re right, I haven’t been asked. I haven’t even thought about that. I think maybe why I love Missouri so much. I was born and raised here. As I said, we’re often referred to as flyover country. And at a certain level, I’m okay with that because we don’t necessarily want everyone moving here, but we want to be the best state, which we already are. And we don’t have to tell everyone. We have the most beautiful geography. We have every opportunity you could possibly want. We do have great schools, and we’re willing to work in the areas where we do have problems. We admit that we’re not perfect. And to me, that’s critical. We are where people that work hard, we play hard, we love our neighbors, we do the right thing. We basically follow the golden rule. And I’d like to think we’re a shining example of what a community and a state should be. And I want to protect that and move it forward.

SWAINO: Last question here. If you want to talk directly to voters, if there are some people who are maybe still on the fence, they’re not sure where they want to cast their vote. What’s your final message to them as a friend?

THOMAS: Well, again, please vote for Dr. Lisa Thomas. I am a psychiatrist. I understand health, healthcare, mental healthcare, social services. Again, I am a champion for boating and water safety. I will protect your liberties and your God-given rights. I’ve been a legislator, so I bring that understanding to the Capitol so we can get ready and right down to business day one. I don’t have to learn the system, and I am passionate about just making sure that everybody has a voice and that we move Missouri forward. And I would very much appreciate your support. Thank you very much.

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (KMIZ)

Former Jefferson City councilman and owner of PMI hotels, Derrick Spicer, says he’s not a career politician, but that no one will fight for Mid-Missourians like he will.

Spicer is one of the six candidates seeking the Senate District 6 seat after Sen. Mike Bernskoetter’s term is up in January 2027. The state senate district covers several Mid-Missouri counties, including Cole, Camden, Miller, Moniteau and Morgan.

Spicer’s opponents are Amber Buckles, Todd “Ike” Skelton, Lisa Thomas, Rudy Veit and Jake Vogel.

HALEY SWAINO: Would you like to let me know about yourself as a person and as a candidate?

SPICER: Well, as a person, I’m not a political insider. I didn’t grow up with a silver spoon in my mouth. Everything I have is what I worked for my whole life. And I’m actually running for the constituents of District 6.

I grew up in Jefferson City here. I was born in Fort Sill in Lawton, Oklahoma. I was an Army brat. Dad was in the military, kind of moved around and ended up here in the third grade. So I’ve been here most of my life. I’ve been married for 32 years this next week. I have two children. Daughter is 31, and my son’s 26 going on about 14. I’m in the hotel business. Actually been in the hotel business, small business owner for quite a while. I spent four years on the Jeff City Council, which I enjoyed my time. I just want to continue to serve. I want to serve the people. And like I said, we get one chance to make a change. And this is going to be because, I mean, a lot of people don’t understand what goes into this. I mean, I’ve been campaigning for a little over two years now, and I’m tired. I got about eight days left, and I cannot wait.

And, you know, I’m actually a guy that for the people. I mean, I’m a guy that don’t have to do this. I’m doing this for us to have a voice at the Capitol, and hopefully it’ll all pan out in eight days. I work for PMI Hotels, which is a group out of, I mean, it’s a, we got about 17 hotels. We own the Courtyard in Jefferson City, the Fairfield, and got a few other hotels around here and some in Omaha, Nebraska. I also work for the Missouri Office of Athletics, which is professional boxing, which I’ve been in most of my life, 40, 41 years. So, you know, I just, like I said, I just want to serve. And like I said, I’m not a public, you know, I’m not a, I’m not a political insider. So just want to, I just want to offer, I’m the people’s choice.

SWAINO: My next question here for you. What do you see as the top issues facing Senate District 6, and what maybe specific legislation would you support or introduce to address some of those issues? 

SPICER: Well, I think right now the issues that’re going on right now is the budget. I mean, you know, I think the state is stagnant. You know, the state is going to be in real trouble here if we don’t get that budget balanced. You know, I think it’s going to be a situation. I think the overspending that’s going on right now in our state is just wasteful. I just think we need to, we got to, get a grip on that.

SWAINO: Alright. How will you balance economic growth within the Show-Me State while also preserving the quality of life for people who live in Missouri communities?

SPICER: Well, you know, it kind of goes to the income tax. You know, you think about income tax. Getting rid of the income tax, which I’m not a rocket scientist when it comes to that stuff. But, you know, Missouri’s been stagnant for a long time. You know, we’re not really growing. And if you look at all the other states that have had the the income tax removed for a long time, they’re growing. I mean, there’s job after job that these, you know, individuals can get. I just don’t think Missouri is growing like it should be. We should be booming here in Missouri, because Missouri is a beautiful state.

SWAINO: How would you work with legislators from both parties when your constituents’ interests are at stake?

SPICER: I think you have to work with everybody. I mean, you can’t just be one-minded or one-sided. You’re going to have to work with every single group. I mean, I just think, and I’ll be honest, which, I just think the lobbyists are too involved. I just think that, you know, we get a lot more done, if it wasn’t for having to deal with … lobbyists that are involved and want more for these big interest groups and all this stuff. I mean, when are we going to focus on our own people? You know, our own people in Missouri?

SWAINO: How would you stay accountable to the people of District 6, if elected? And then how can constituents expect to stay in communication with you during your term?

SPICER: Well, I’ve always been a call me on the phone. I’ve always been an open door. I mean, I even when I was on the city council, I mean, even with my job today, I mean, I work 24/7, seven days a week. I mean, I don’t know anything different. And I’m always available. You know, you could see I always communicated with you. I always try to.

I just think that that they’ll never have another candidate like myself because I, if I do something, I am fully ahead of speed. So I just think that, you know, you got to be willing to, and I want people to understand that, if elected, you have an open door with me at the Capitol because that’s who’s voted mein, I mean I’m working for them. I’m not working for everybody else. And, you know, what’s the best thing about my campaign, is all the money I’ve raised, I raise myself. I don’t owe anybody nothing besides my constituents of District 6. Let’s focus on them first, and then we’ll focus on other stuff that’s going on in Missouri.

SWAINO: My next question here, one I’ve asked everybody. It’s obviously stuff that also works out at the federal level, but what should Missouri do to address the rising cost of living? 

SPICER: Well, that’s a good question. The rising costs is going on everywhere. You know, Missouri is, I mean, it’s not just here. It’s just, I think at the federal level, where we don’t really have any control over it, we do the best we can do. That’s what I was kind of talking about are things are rising. And I think that eventually it will get better because I think President Trump is, he’s another guy that’s actually for the people. And I think eventually things are going to go back to normal. I think it’s just going to take some time.

And with good leadership in here in Missouri, and eventually Governor Kehoe, Governor Kehoe is doing a great job. And, you know, I think it’s going to continue to take good leadership to get them costs down because it is tough on families and people working two jobs and trying to make it. I mean, I’m a middle-class person myself so, and I know what hard work is. So I just think eventually, I don’t like paying $4 a gallon for gas, just like everyone else has to do. So we do need to get costs down. Whatever we have to do to do that, we need to. And I just think it like I said, it takes good leadership at the Capitol, and I think there’s some good senators over there right now. And I think eventually in the next four years, I think you’re going to see a big turn.

SWAINO: You spoke a little bit to this already, but what is your position on state taxes? Would you support raising or lowering them?

SPICER: I would support lowering state taxes. 

SWAINO: You want to elaborate on why at all? 

SPICER: Well, I mean, I’m for no taxes. You know, I don’t think we should be paying a lot of taxes myself. I mean, I know we have to have taxes to survive. You know, I just think that sometimes it’s overboard. You know, = I always worry about the middle class and other people, too, because if you raise taxes, it’s just like on Amendment 5, I don’t have any say so on Amendment 5. That’s why it’s called the people, you know, go to the people for a vote. I get to vote just like they do, you know. But  I just think that we need to, we have to be able to lower taxes because if you look at our tax system right now, it’s so outdated. And it needs to be updated. And I just think, like I said before, we’ve just been so stagnant for so long, and I think with Amendment 5, if you don’t take chances, how would you know how we would be down the road? You know, I just, like I said, I just, it’s a situation that I don’t have, it ain’t my decision. That’s what I love about it — it’s going to the people, and they can make their voice heard.

SWAINO: Why are you the best candidate for this seat?

SPICER: I’m the best candidate for this seat because I’m actually for the constituents of District 6, because I’m one of them. And I want people to understand that everywhere in the district is just as important to me as the people in Jefferson City. I’m not a part of the establishment. I am, I’m me. And I’ve been a fighter my whole life. And I, I want to continue to fight for the district and, you know, it’s, I just think that it’s a situation where I have an opportunity to serve the people. And like I said before and earlier, I don’t have to do this. I said I’m doing this because they’re going to get one chance in eight days to make a change. And I’m the change. If they want the same old crap, I’m not your guy. So if they want somebody that’s going to be actually for them, then I will get elected in eight days.

SWAINO: Nearing the end of the long campaign trail, like you said, is there anything throughout your campaign, throughout, you know, candidate forums that maybe you don’t get asked that you want people to know about yourself or your stance on something you as a person?

SPICER: Just a lot of people don’t really know my life. They don’t know what I went through. You know, I’ve done a, I do a lot of charity work. I do a lot. You know, I have a really close friend, Ozzie Smith in Saint Louis, and we do a lot of do a lot of charity stuff with them. I mean, I’ve done a lot in the past with Boys and Girls Club and everything. I’ve always been a person that’s given back. And, you know, I’ll always give more than I’ll ever receive in my life. And I’m good with that. I’m good with that. So I felt like God put me on this Earth, you know, and He, you know, I feel like He has a plan for me. I feel like He’s been pushing me to run here. And if that’s God’s plan, then I’ll get elected next week.

And, you know, it’s been a great journey, though. I mean, it’s been a tiresome journey. But I’ve met some good people along the way. I mean, you definitely find out who your friends are in this business, that’s for sure. But, you know, I kind of just wish people would know more about who they’re voting for, find out if it’s a person that you want to support. Maybe look into their history and what they’ve done and the community work and things they’ve done for different things. I mean, I think your character means everything. And it does to me. I mean, my character means everything to me. And I just think that people get into politics for the wrong reasons. And I’m actually a person that’s in it for the right reasons. So, but they only get one chance, and it’s coming in eight days because it will not be another run if I don’t win.

SWAINO: Last question here, then, for some voters who may still be on the fence, not sure about where they’re going to cast their vote, what would your final message to them as they head to the ballot boxes here soon?

SPICER: Well, I just think, like I said before, I think that people need to understand that we’ve never had another candidate like myself. I mean, a lot of people are already bought before they even get in there. Well, I’ve never been a yes man in my life and I’m not going to be. And I just want people to understand that, you know, I know who I am. I would love for you to know who I am. And I want you to know that there’s no other candidate out there that will fight for you like I will. I would love to have your vote Aug. 4.

COLUMBIA, Mo. (KMIZ)

The mother of a Harrisburg student who was killed in a crash last month in Iowa has filed a lawsuit against the youth’s father’s employer.

Robert Orton, 14, was killed on June 3 when a 2015 Kenworth truck driven by Michael Orton, 38, of Palmyra, Missouri, crossed tracks in front of a train on Highway 21 in Poweshiek County, according to an Iowa State Patrol crash report. Michael Orton was injured in the crash.

The crash happened near Victor, Iowa, between Des Moines and Cedar Rapids, previous reporting shows.

Emily Phillippe, the youth’s mother, filed a lawsuit on Monday in Boone County against Sydenstricker Nobbe Partners, Inc.

The petition claims Sydenstricker owned the truck and “owed Plaintiff and others a duty to exercise the highest degree of care in operation of the 2015 Kenworth.”

“Michael James Orton operated the 2015 Kenworth through the course and scope of his agency with Defendant Sydenstricker at the time of the collision, therefore, Defendant Sydenstricker is vicariously liable for Michael James Orton’s actions,” the lawsuit alleges.