IID responds to new Colorado River plan that will see steep cuts to water use in three states
IMPERIAL, Calif. (KESQ) – The Imperial Irrigation District issued a statement responding to the announcement of a new Colorado River plan that will require three states to slash their water use by 16 to 20% through 2028 as the water levels reach new lows.
On Friday, the US Bureau of Reclamation published its final environmental impact statement, a 10-year operating framework for the waterway under which the lower basin states of California, Arizona and Nevada could face collective cuts of up to 3 million acre-feet per year — enough water to supply roughly 9 million average US families.
The framework provides for specific operating plans to be developed every two years. Federal officials are expected to publish the first of these in the coming days, which will specify the exact cuts required of states through 2028 — anticipated to be around 20% for the lower basin. The upper basin states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming are not expected to face mandatory cuts.
Of particular importance to IID, the framework provides for Colorado River shortages to be distributed through agreement in the Lower Basin or, absent agreement, consistent with the Law of the River.
“Protecting the Imperial Valley and the Colorado River, our only water supply, is IID’s top priority during this process,” said IID Board Chairwoman Karin Eugenio. “The Final EIS recognizes that changes as to how shortages are shared must come through voluntary agreements. That respects senior water rights while allowing the states to work together voluntarily when the system needs help.”
IID officials said that since 2003, the company’s conservation programs have generated more than 9.2 million acre-feet of conserved Colorado River water through agricultural efficiency, system improvements and voluntary agreements.
IID’s most recent system conservation contribution includes up to an additional 100,000 acre-feet in 2026. Altogether, IID’s system conservation contributions are expected to total about 900,000 acre-feet over the last four years, adding more than 13 feet of elevation in Lake Mead.
“Imperial Valley has stepped up again and again,” Eugenio said. “For decades our farmers have helped protect the system and other Colorado River water users while continuing to grow food to feed the nation and sustain our rural communities. IID will continue to be open to help provided our rights are protected, the terms are fair and participation remains voluntary.”
District officials also added that IID continues to advocate for meaningful and verifiable Upper Basin contributions.
“The Lower Basin cannot stabilize the river alone,” Eugenio said. “A shared river requires a shared commitment, and every part of the basin must be actively involved.”
The Colorado River is the lifeblood of the Southwest. It irrigates more than 5 million acres of farmland, generates enough electricity to power around 700,000 homes and provides water for 40 million people. However, it has shrunk dramatically over the past 25 years after years of heavy use and as climate change delivers hotter, drier weather and dwindling snow. Today, 95% of the basin is in drought.
The combined water level in Lake Powell and Lake Mead — the most important Colorado River reservoirs and two of the biggest in the United States — fell to a historic low last week.
Check Out Angela Chen’s Series on the Colorado River Crisis
Colorado River water is divided between states under the 1922 Colorado River compact, which allots 7.5 million acre-feet of water yearly for the four upper basin states and another 7.5 million for the three in the lower basin. But as water levels dwindle, states have been trying to work out how to get by with less.
The lower basin states have historically used the most water, primarily to support their vast farms and booming cities. Over the past few years, the three states have proposed cuts in their water use but want the upper basin states to share in the pain.
The upper basin states — which, unlike the lower basin states, cannot be compelled by federal authorities to cut their water use — have resisted mandatory cuts, arguing that climate change has reduced water availability and the cuts should be shouldered by the more water-intensive states.
The current agreement governing the operation and management of the Colorado River, which came into force in 2007, expires this year and a February federal deadline for the states to reach a new agreement came and went with no deal.
Experts fear the current plan won’t be enough as the water crisis deepens. Last winter was one of the driest, warmest winters on record for the western US, leaving the region in a snow drought.
Lake Mead appears on track to tumble to its lowest level on record as early as next week, and Lake Powell may do so next month. Lake Powell could potentially fall so low by spring 2027 that it reaches “minimum power pool” level, meaning its dam will no longer be able to generate hydropower, according to a July report from the Bureau of Reclamation.
There are fears that the issue may end up the subject of lengthy and expensive court battles. Arizona in particular has been rattling the litigation saber. The state is likely to get saddled with the steepest cuts during times of shortage due to a deal it made in the 1960s, but its needs are huge to feed sprawling farms and industry.
The new framework “does nothing to elevate expectations around a coherent seven-state plan for shared sacrifice,” the Arizona Department of Water Resources said in a statement Friday, saying the reductions proposed “would devastate Arizona’s water users and its economy.”
States will still be able to carry on negotiations in the meantime, and any agreement could supplant the federal plan.
Click here to follow the original article.