By Aaron Hegarty
Click here for updates on this story
LINCOLN, Nebraska (KETV) — In November 2026, Nebraskans could vote on the future of the state’s elections.
Two ballot initiatives were announced Tuesday. One would switch Nebraska to “winner-take-all” presidential elections. Another would end the use of vote counting and voting machines.
Both would amend the state constitution, which requires 10% of all Nebraska registered voters to sign a petition.
A new group formed this summer, Advocates For All Nebraskans, announced the initiatives at a press conference at Lincoln’s Cornhusker Hotel on Tuesday.
The same organization announced ballot initiatives on property taxes in August. It’s now started five ballot initiatives.
Former Nebraska Republican Party Chair Eric Underwood led the news conference. He said Tuesday was chosen to honor Charlie Kirk, who traveled to Nebraska to push for winner-take-all in 2024.
Underwood and other sponsors said the initiatives are bipartisan issues. Underwood said all sponsors are Republicans.
Co-sponsor Danna Seevers said the organization has a “professional statewide effort that is built for success.”
Success in ballot initiatives often relies on funding, and AFAN is seeking the greater number of signatures required for constitutional amendments.
“I feel very confident saying is that the national presence is going to be there to support these movements,” Underwood said.
Underwood and other sponsors argued that switching to winner-take-all would give all Nebraskans a voice. He said candidates campaigning in Nebraska used to travel across the entire state, but now they only visit the Omaha area.
A change to winner-take-all would make it exceptionally difficult for a Democrat to win any votes in Nebraska. While Nebraska is not a swing state, the 2nd District is a swing area, opponents say, and the only reason presidential candidates spend significant resources in Nebraska. The state’s popular vote was last won by a Democrat in 1964, Lyndon Johnson.
Co-sponsor Kirk Penner said the initiative requiring votes to be counted by hand would ensure secure elections. Nebraska would be the only state that would do so. Penner said it would make Nebraska a “trendsetter” on election security.
Civic Nebraska is also opposed to winner-take-all in Nebraska and the vote-counting measure.
“Requiring hand-counting of ballots would dismantle a secure and proven system in favor of one that is slow and prone to error, simply to address conspiracy theories that have been repeatedly debunked. It would waste taxpayer money, invite chaos, corruption, and human error, and undermine trust in the very elections it claims to protect,” Civic Nebraska’s statement read in part.
Nebraska made the switch to give the winner of each congressional district one electoral vote in 1991. Two electoral votes still go on to the overall winner.
It took until Barack Obama in 2008 for a Democrat to win in any single district. Republicans rebounded in Nebraska’s 2nd congressional district in 2012 and 2016. The split vote has only ever been a factor in the Omaha metro area’s 2nd District.
Now, however, a Democrat has won in the district in two consecutive presidential elections.
When Kamala Harris won the district by four points last year, it was the first time a Democrat did not also go on to be elected.
Underwood said the initiatives have 45 co-sponsors. A list of the organization’s ballot initiatives and the precise language is here.
Nebraska Democratic Party Chair Jane Kleeb said in a statement to KETV: “Republicans know they do not have the votes to change our fair electoral vote system, so they are trying anything to rig the outcome from early redistricting and ballot campaigns. Nebraskans made it clear last year they support our fair electoral system. Our elected officials should instead be training other states to follow Nebraska and Maine, the only two states in the nation that give all voters a voice and a fair shot.”
Please note: This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.